The latest Suz Brockmann comes out today! It's called Into the Fire and you should buy it and read it. If you're a long time fan, maybe give a refresh read to Flashpoint and Into the Storm for the recurring characters, or just read ITF once, go back and read those two, then come back and read ITF again.
Here's a spoiler free review. Even the summary cover text posted after it isn't too bad, spoiler wise. Myself, I've started to avoid spoilers - I don't want to know everything. I know that the main couple winds up together at the end because it's a romance, but Suz is known to be pretty evil to her secondary characters. And I like to be surprised. I keep trying to read her books slowly to wallow in the world building for a couple of days, but that plan has not been working so well recently. They're thriller/suspense after all, and I think she does a great job with pacing.
She also doesn't stick to traditional "perfect, whitebread" characters for all she writes about Navy SEALs and counterterrorist action. The previous novel All Through the Night featured a hero and a hero - and all the proceeds go to Mass Equality in perpetuity. In this novel, there's an Black/Asian/Irish Hero and a limping, deaf heroine.
Check out the front display at Borders or B&N today. Buy, buy, buy! If for no other reason than to see if my name made it into the Acknowledgements again. But the best reason is that she writes a fun story that can be read over and over.
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Saturday, July 19, 2008
Mockarena
Things I used to mock, but now use all the time and would mess up my day if they were gone:
The car wash and bottled water are specific to being in CA. I didn't need them much before moving to SoCal. But if I want to see through my windshield, and not be embarrased by my ride, it must be washed regularly. Since they know this in CA, most car washes come with an interior vacuum and trash removal, then interior and exterior glass cleaning. Love it. The bottled water is because I travel greater distances by car in CA and despite being 20-40 miles from millions of people, there are places out here where I would want to have emergency water with me which is drinkable after a week sitting in 120F heat. My emergency water is kept in the car and I consume it regularly.
The bottled water and pre-wash veggies I used to mock as being lazy and wasteful versions that any eco friendly person would be able to do for themselves. Not true. Turns out that the alternative to pre-washed peas is NOT unwashed peas, it is Doritoes or Snickers. The alternative to bottled water is not tap water, it is Dr. Pepper or Squirt. I still shop at the farmer's market and rinse all my produce in the 25% vinegar wash, unless I'm just boiling it right away like corn, or water will kill it like mushrooms. But if I'm away from home and jonesing for a drink and a crunchy snack, a bag of snap peas is healthier than the chips by far, and the water from my trunk is both better for me than soda and much, much cheaper than buying it piecemeal. Yes it is true that these things can replace their more labor intensive cousins as well, but not even that is terrible, given the number of people I've seen running water at full bore for several minutes while they wash a single, semi-disposable food or drink container. Does 10 gallons of water down the drain outweigh the resources to create and procure a new container, putting even the eco friendly argument on shaky ground?
The dishwasher is in there as an apology of sorts to my former roommate. I didn't "need" one then. I do now. And the orthotics always seemed like something for inferior people who failed, but now I can't stand up for more than a few minutes without them. And they tend to make my heels fit my shoes better which I like too, although avoiding the feeling of walking on broken glass is plenty sufficient reason.
The jury is still out on boxed wine. I'm thinking I should get some and check it out.
Yo blogland, what did you used to think was idiotic and now find essential? Mine can't be a comprehensive list. Or is there a group of people you formerly didn't sympathize with and now do?
- cell phones
- car wash
- bottled water
- pre-washed, ready-to-eat produce
- dishwasher
- orthotics
- to do lists
The car wash and bottled water are specific to being in CA. I didn't need them much before moving to SoCal. But if I want to see through my windshield, and not be embarrased by my ride, it must be washed regularly. Since they know this in CA, most car washes come with an interior vacuum and trash removal, then interior and exterior glass cleaning. Love it. The bottled water is because I travel greater distances by car in CA and despite being 20-40 miles from millions of people, there are places out here where I would want to have emergency water with me which is drinkable after a week sitting in 120F heat. My emergency water is kept in the car and I consume it regularly.
The bottled water and pre-wash veggies I used to mock as being lazy and wasteful versions that any eco friendly person would be able to do for themselves. Not true. Turns out that the alternative to pre-washed peas is NOT unwashed peas, it is Doritoes or Snickers. The alternative to bottled water is not tap water, it is Dr. Pepper or Squirt. I still shop at the farmer's market and rinse all my produce in the 25% vinegar wash, unless I'm just boiling it right away like corn, or water will kill it like mushrooms. But if I'm away from home and jonesing for a drink and a crunchy snack, a bag of snap peas is healthier than the chips by far, and the water from my trunk is both better for me than soda and much, much cheaper than buying it piecemeal. Yes it is true that these things can replace their more labor intensive cousins as well, but not even that is terrible, given the number of people I've seen running water at full bore for several minutes while they wash a single, semi-disposable food or drink container. Does 10 gallons of water down the drain outweigh the resources to create and procure a new container, putting even the eco friendly argument on shaky ground?
The dishwasher is in there as an apology of sorts to my former roommate. I didn't "need" one then. I do now. And the orthotics always seemed like something for inferior people who failed, but now I can't stand up for more than a few minutes without them. And they tend to make my heels fit my shoes better which I like too, although avoiding the feeling of walking on broken glass is plenty sufficient reason.
The jury is still out on boxed wine. I'm thinking I should get some and check it out.
Yo blogland, what did you used to think was idiotic and now find essential? Mine can't be a comprehensive list. Or is there a group of people you formerly didn't sympathize with and now do?
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Just Good
Following the example of "Someone in a Tree", I popped my blog into Wordle and got a pop art version of the blog. All I can think of to describe it is: "same song, second verse, sideways accent, whole lot worse!"
Well, I can read the big font words too:
See! Just really little...
Get Good like can one got.
something
And here I thought "and" and "but" would top the list. Maybe they take out "of, to, the, and" and the like. Yes. it turns out they do take out common words. If you undo that decision it becomes really boring. But I played around with some other options and got this, which I like a little better with the colors and horozontility of it.
As long as I'm on the topic of wordplay, we had an amusing discussion at lunch. We eat at SouPlantation on tuesdays. I really like their cream of mushroom and was talking it up to the guy who tried the thai meatball soup and found it lacking. So he went off to try my favorite and another colleague asked if he was going to get "Cream of Mischief" soup.
Then we had a discussion of alternate energy and preparing for a funeral and various body disposal methods. It devolved into suggesting that the slogan for "Soylent Fuel" would be, "I run on dead people."
To summarize the good things, or rather, I just got good somethings:
Well, I can read the big font words too:
See! Just really little...
Get Good like can one got.
something
And here I thought "and" and "but" would top the list. Maybe they take out "of, to, the, and" and the like. Yes. it turns out they do take out common words. If you undo that decision it becomes really boring. But I played around with some other options and got this, which I like a little better with the colors and horozontility of it.
As long as I'm on the topic of wordplay, we had an amusing discussion at lunch. We eat at SouPlantation on tuesdays. I really like their cream of mushroom and was talking it up to the guy who tried the thai meatball soup and found it lacking. So he went off to try my favorite and another colleague asked if he was going to get "Cream of Mischief" soup.
Then we had a discussion of alternate energy and preparing for a funeral and various body disposal methods. It devolved into suggesting that the slogan for "Soylent Fuel" would be, "I run on dead people."
To summarize the good things, or rather, I just got good somethings:
- Wordplay is fun
- I've been sleeping well this week - getting sleepy at 11 and going to bed by 12
- The masseuse at the chiropractor is excellent
Monday, July 14, 2008
Don't Just Do Something
In the Freakonomics comments, someone mentioned that some common advice from his Med School dean was "Don't just do something; stand there!" Basically it means don't waste resources just so it looks like you're doing something if the something you're doing will not be of benefit. I wish someone would tell this to politicians. As I understand it, GWB (Great White Bonehead?) is overturning Daddy's offshore drilling prohibition. CA still has its own laws and should continue to disallow it, but still. One can only hope the congress doesn't roll over and play dead on this one too. Contrary to what the president thinks, "failure to act" is perfectly acceptable to this American when acting is is just that. Acting.
If this article and many others can be believed, removing this protection will not help our oil supply much if at all. And not for about 15-30 years. I'm no anti-oil gal. I love to drive and I seriously considered oil drilling as a career. But the numbers on this don't add up. At the cost of losing years of tourism dollars and fishing at otherwise pretty nice coastlines we get 6 extra months of oil at todays usage rates. The Sau.di's probably spill that much every week.
Maybe it won't be a total trainwreck, or shipwreck, but the effects won't be invisible. Every oil well has some seepage. The industry employs some really good engineers to minimize waste, but it's expensive and there are diminishing returns at a certain point. It can be kept to a minimum with careful enforcement of careful regulations (making the crossover point of diminishing returns more environmentally favorable), but after this administration, I'm not counting on those regulations still existing, or getting enforced if they do. There is value beyond oil in the land and neighboring waters. If we're really that hard up for oil, I have a friend with a tappable farm in Texas that wouldn't mind some extra income. I just think that if we have areas already available, we should use those before we offer up paradise.
I remember watching a nature show that was profiling some equatorial waters which had been overfished. They managed to set aside 10% of the the local shallow waters as a no fishing zone and were really good at getting after poachers. After just a couple years with this really quite minor concession, most of the species that they were concerned about dying off completely had come back in fishable numbers, even while fishing continued in the other 90%. Just by having a little space for R&R where they wouldn't get hassled.
Some serious irony is that GWB has or is considering setting aside 640,000 acres of ocean near Guam (no where Americans would be hassled by it) as a nature preserve so he can go down in history as a great saver of wildlife. Um. Yeah. In the meantime, the great destroyer is stomping all over things that were settled long ago.
It didn't help my mood that NPR, who I should be able to trust to give me real information, is falling down on the job, again. I woke up to a story where they interviewed someone in Florida who makes a living from the beaches basically agreed with me and science, then someone in another Gulf State who has natural gas wells offshore. The "opposing" attitude was "we're doing our part so Florida should do theirs". The reporter basically left the piece with the totally incorrect impression that
What the hell is so hard about saying "yeah, we're going to give up this minor thing, to get a major return in the future" and just sticking with it until the future happens? We're not ruling out every oil well in the country - we already have lots of untapped land and water available, we don't really need this bit. And if we do develop it, you heard it here: It's going to go wrong and I told you so. I'll see you at the beach museum. I bet Disney will make a great one.
EDITED to add:
I just heard the president's press conference on the radio. I'm really impressed that the reporters didn't spend their whole time coughing *bullshit* into their hands. And for once, they asked some good questions. They got back "rah rah go team, my way or the highway, cartoon overview" answers and the president showed yet again how condescending and intolerant he can be. It's like we elected Cartman for president.
But my point was more to make an analogy. Say we have a cabin in the woods and this winter is colder than usual and we need to burn more wood to keep warm. In the past, when our family owned the big employer in town, we could get aged, pre-cut wood from the neighbors for a decent price because they wanted to stay on our good side. But we've mismanaged that company into the ground and laid off a lot of people and the stock tanked, so the wood supplying neighbor is in need of extra funds and is charging us more than we'd budgeted for the wood. So instead of trying to fix things at the company and just sucking up the extra wood cost until it turns around, we're going to and cut down the tree great grandma planted in the front yard that provides shade for the porch, support for swings, and the best curb appeal in the county. Despite the fact that one needs to let the wood sit for months before it's ok for burning. But that's ok, it "shows the neighborhood" that we're "willing to sacrifice" so they have confidence that the cost of wood will settle down soon. Nope. All it does is make us look short sighted and desperate.
If this article and many others can be believed, removing this protection will not help our oil supply much if at all. And not for about 15-30 years. I'm no anti-oil gal. I love to drive and I seriously considered oil drilling as a career. But the numbers on this don't add up. At the cost of losing years of tourism dollars and fishing at otherwise pretty nice coastlines we get 6 extra months of oil at todays usage rates. The Sau.di's probably spill that much every week.
Maybe it won't be a total trainwreck, or shipwreck, but the effects won't be invisible. Every oil well has some seepage. The industry employs some really good engineers to minimize waste, but it's expensive and there are diminishing returns at a certain point. It can be kept to a minimum with careful enforcement of careful regulations (making the crossover point of diminishing returns more environmentally favorable), but after this administration, I'm not counting on those regulations still existing, or getting enforced if they do. There is value beyond oil in the land and neighboring waters. If we're really that hard up for oil, I have a friend with a tappable farm in Texas that wouldn't mind some extra income. I just think that if we have areas already available, we should use those before we offer up paradise.
I remember watching a nature show that was profiling some equatorial waters which had been overfished. They managed to set aside 10% of the the local shallow waters as a no fishing zone and were really good at getting after poachers. After just a couple years with this really quite minor concession, most of the species that they were concerned about dying off completely had come back in fishable numbers, even while fishing continued in the other 90%. Just by having a little space for R&R where they wouldn't get hassled.
Some serious irony is that GWB has or is considering setting aside 640,000 acres of ocean near Guam (no where Americans would be hassled by it) as a nature preserve so he can go down in history as a great saver of wildlife. Um. Yeah. In the meantime, the great destroyer is stomping all over things that were settled long ago.
It didn't help my mood that NPR, who I should be able to trust to give me real information, is falling down on the job, again. I woke up to a story where they interviewed someone in Florida who makes a living from the beaches basically agreed with me and science, then someone in another Gulf State who has natural gas wells offshore. The "opposing" attitude was "we're doing our part so Florida should do theirs". The reporter basically left the piece with the totally incorrect impression that
- drilling in protected waters off Florida would substantially affect our oil supply,
- gas prices would come down now if we drill in Florida
- anyone who is against drilling isn't doing their part for America.
What the hell is so hard about saying "yeah, we're going to give up this minor thing, to get a major return in the future" and just sticking with it until the future happens? We're not ruling out every oil well in the country - we already have lots of untapped land and water available, we don't really need this bit. And if we do develop it, you heard it here: It's going to go wrong and I told you so. I'll see you at the beach museum. I bet Disney will make a great one.
EDITED to add:
I just heard the president's press conference on the radio. I'm really impressed that the reporters didn't spend their whole time coughing *bullshit* into their hands. And for once, they asked some good questions. They got back "rah rah go team, my way or the highway, cartoon overview" answers and the president showed yet again how condescending and intolerant he can be. It's like we elected Cartman for president.
But my point was more to make an analogy. Say we have a cabin in the woods and this winter is colder than usual and we need to burn more wood to keep warm. In the past, when our family owned the big employer in town, we could get aged, pre-cut wood from the neighbors for a decent price because they wanted to stay on our good side. But we've mismanaged that company into the ground and laid off a lot of people and the stock tanked, so the wood supplying neighbor is in need of extra funds and is charging us more than we'd budgeted for the wood. So instead of trying to fix things at the company and just sucking up the extra wood cost until it turns around, we're going to and cut down the tree great grandma planted in the front yard that provides shade for the porch, support for swings, and the best curb appeal in the county. Despite the fact that one needs to let the wood sit for months before it's ok for burning. But that's ok, it "shows the neighborhood" that we're "willing to sacrifice" so they have confidence that the cost of wood will settle down soon. Nope. All it does is make us look short sighted and desperate.
Sunday, July 13, 2008
Random Sunday
OK, just pretend I spent this week blogging about:
How long it took photobucket to upload these pictures of our fireworks hill on fire. (Aprox 2 days). It started small.
It got a little bigger before they put it out. This was the worst of it. (You can sleep again, mom.)
The Robert Crais booksigning for Catching Darkness at my little local store, and meeting someone at the booksigning who knew Suz Brockmann from her rock band days.
Getting a sleep study with all the attendant electrodes and other monitoring devices displacing my PJs.
Going to a BBQ / pool party with my SWE group on saturday and allowing myself enough time to make and package for transit some deviled eggs and chocolate dipped strawberries, and having fun making and messing around with presentation. I forgot the camera at home because I was charging the battery after it didn't really want to take this photo.
The fact that you can get avocados on just about anything in CA, so my burger at the bbq had ketchup, mayo, avocado, sprouts, lettuce, pickles, and man was it tasty.
Deciding to go shopping for low cut shirts instead of building these cabinets
Hating how bulgy I am, because I just miss fitting into honest XLs.
Finally deciding on 19 shirts of approximately 190 things I tried on with a minimum of 70s patterning an colors, which was harder than it should have been.
If you look closely, you can see I went with the "if I like the style and it's comfy and flattering, I'll get several in different colors" method of selection, so 10 of the things are one of 4 styles in different colors. It was funny, most of the clothes were orange or lime green. I could be a chameleon in my condo.
Reading at the pool with an uneven application of SPF30.
Getting a new bluetooth enabled phone only to find out that it cuts out after 25 minutes instead of 33 and has no decent free ringtones to speak of. Bleah. I have 14 days to chat people up to see if it keeps dying young. And see if it works with my hands free doohickey. It was the "free with the plan" phone.
See, it was a pretty busy week. I thought of all sorts of things to blog about but didn't blog. I'm kinda ok with that since the pictures for this uploaded pretty quick. All of this was pretty much good, happy stuff.
How long it took photobucket to upload these pictures of our fireworks hill on fire. (Aprox 2 days). It started small.
It got a little bigger before they put it out. This was the worst of it. (You can sleep again, mom.)
The Robert Crais booksigning for Catching Darkness at my little local store, and meeting someone at the booksigning who knew Suz Brockmann from her rock band days.
Getting a sleep study with all the attendant electrodes and other monitoring devices displacing my PJs.
Going to a BBQ / pool party with my SWE group on saturday and allowing myself enough time to make and package for transit some deviled eggs and chocolate dipped strawberries, and having fun making and messing around with presentation. I forgot the camera at home because I was charging the battery after it didn't really want to take this photo.
The fact that you can get avocados on just about anything in CA, so my burger at the bbq had ketchup, mayo, avocado, sprouts, lettuce, pickles, and man was it tasty.
Deciding to go shopping for low cut shirts instead of building these cabinets
Hating how bulgy I am, because I just miss fitting into honest XLs.
Finally deciding on 19 shirts of approximately 190 things I tried on with a minimum of 70s patterning an colors, which was harder than it should have been.
If you look closely, you can see I went with the "if I like the style and it's comfy and flattering, I'll get several in different colors" method of selection, so 10 of the things are one of 4 styles in different colors. It was funny, most of the clothes were orange or lime green. I could be a chameleon in my condo.
Reading at the pool with an uneven application of SPF30.
Getting a new bluetooth enabled phone only to find out that it cuts out after 25 minutes instead of 33 and has no decent free ringtones to speak of. Bleah. I have 14 days to chat people up to see if it keeps dying young. And see if it works with my hands free doohickey. It was the "free with the plan" phone.
See, it was a pretty busy week. I thought of all sorts of things to blog about but didn't blog. I'm kinda ok with that since the pictures for this uploaded pretty quick. All of this was pretty much good, happy stuff.
- Catching Darkness is another good read
- I've got date shirts
- the enhanced strawberries were described as "nature's most perfect food"
- and I got to swim and make vitamin D to my heart's content.
Saturday, July 5, 2008
And the Sky Lit Up
Happy 4th of July all!
My town does a respectable little fireworks display. They set them off from a hill near the mall so everyone can park at the mall parking lot. They turn off the safety lights for the show so the view is good. They work with the local NPR station to simulcast a patriotic medley and did a good job of switching fireworks with different songs. There were some funky ones that shot up and appeared to zig zag, but it was closely timed repeats that gave the effect. They had a few that burst in the big ball, then started zigging and zagging all over (my favorites, I think). They did a couple of smiley faces, something that was probably supposed to be a square, several disk shaped ones and smaller balls with orbitals. I enjoyed it.
I didn't bother taking pictures because while my tiny Elph/power shot is good for lots of stuff, it doesn't let me manually override it in the way I need to get good pictures of fireworks, or the little bit of the hill they set on fire with the fireworks. Whoops! They got it put out in about 5 minutes, but since I was sitting around talking on the phone or reading a book waiting for the traffic to clear, I got to see some of it.
Today, I woke up feeling pretty good for once. This was good because I was meeting a friend in Westwood for an early matinee of Hancock. Who runs movies at 10:30am? Of course that was perfect for seeing on a big screen in a movie theater that cares about the film its running on its only screen and has good sound, then heading out for lunch. I had heard a rumor back when I had trouble with traffic detours that they were filming a Will Smith movie on the 105. Shor' nuff, the opening sequence was probably what I saw on the road because that stretch of road is the 105. And not in any way connected to the other roads or buildings they flew over or jumped on. Total Hollywood mishmash of places. On the whole, I liked the movie. There was a worldbuilding premise I had a little trouble with, but it didn't kill the movie for me halfway through like it did for Roger Ebert. My friend's biggest quibble was the product placement of Dunkin Donuts's coffee when you really can't find DD out here. There could have been more of Will in, um, less. If you like him or Charlize Theron or superhero movies generally, go see it. I'd give it 3/5 stars - watchable, fun, enjoyable, wouldn't probably watch it again on purpose, but wouldn't leave the room if it came on. Avoid spoilers.
After the movie, my friend and I had a local lunch then decided to hit up IKEA. She's normally without wheels, and IKEA is less far from her place than it is from mine, and she wanted a chair that she'd been dithering over for 3 years. We had a good time together, both got a headache from the sheer overload that is IKEA, then came back and had "Red Mango" frozen yogurt. Much superior to the too-sharp pinkberry, IMHO.
We also passed some seriously heavy traffic on the 405N due to a small bit of hillside going up in flames. It was doused and just blackened char by the time we passed it but I didn't think the traffic would clear, even with the stop for frogurt, so I took the opportunity to see if there's another way through them thar hills. And there is. Beverly Glen is a lovely little meandering canyon road sporting very few places to fall to one's death. It goes a little slow because the single lane road is narrow, homes are built close to the edge, and the visibility isn't grand and you get stuck behind poky people in your one little lane. But if you know this stuff going in and think about how superior it is to be going poky there with a view (of homes, mostly) rather than being in stop and go traffic on the freeway, it's quite enjoyable. I'll have to remember it. And I need to remember to take my Mullholland Drive tour sometime. I hear it's a fun road too.
My town does a respectable little fireworks display. They set them off from a hill near the mall so everyone can park at the mall parking lot. They turn off the safety lights for the show so the view is good. They work with the local NPR station to simulcast a patriotic medley and did a good job of switching fireworks with different songs. There were some funky ones that shot up and appeared to zig zag, but it was closely timed repeats that gave the effect. They had a few that burst in the big ball, then started zigging and zagging all over (my favorites, I think). They did a couple of smiley faces, something that was probably supposed to be a square, several disk shaped ones and smaller balls with orbitals. I enjoyed it.
I didn't bother taking pictures because while my tiny Elph/power shot is good for lots of stuff, it doesn't let me manually override it in the way I need to get good pictures of fireworks, or the little bit of the hill they set on fire with the fireworks. Whoops! They got it put out in about 5 minutes, but since I was sitting around talking on the phone or reading a book waiting for the traffic to clear, I got to see some of it.
Today, I woke up feeling pretty good for once. This was good because I was meeting a friend in Westwood for an early matinee of Hancock. Who runs movies at 10:30am? Of course that was perfect for seeing on a big screen in a movie theater that cares about the film its running on its only screen and has good sound, then heading out for lunch. I had heard a rumor back when I had trouble with traffic detours that they were filming a Will Smith movie on the 105. Shor' nuff, the opening sequence was probably what I saw on the road because that stretch of road is the 105. And not in any way connected to the other roads or buildings they flew over or jumped on. Total Hollywood mishmash of places. On the whole, I liked the movie. There was a worldbuilding premise I had a little trouble with, but it didn't kill the movie for me halfway through like it did for Roger Ebert. My friend's biggest quibble was the product placement of Dunkin Donuts's coffee when you really can't find DD out here. There could have been more of Will in, um, less. If you like him or Charlize Theron or superhero movies generally, go see it. I'd give it 3/5 stars - watchable, fun, enjoyable, wouldn't probably watch it again on purpose, but wouldn't leave the room if it came on. Avoid spoilers.
After the movie, my friend and I had a local lunch then decided to hit up IKEA. She's normally without wheels, and IKEA is less far from her place than it is from mine, and she wanted a chair that she'd been dithering over for 3 years. We had a good time together, both got a headache from the sheer overload that is IKEA, then came back and had "Red Mango" frozen yogurt. Much superior to the too-sharp pinkberry, IMHO.
We also passed some seriously heavy traffic on the 405N due to a small bit of hillside going up in flames. It was doused and just blackened char by the time we passed it but I didn't think the traffic would clear, even with the stop for frogurt, so I took the opportunity to see if there's another way through them thar hills. And there is. Beverly Glen is a lovely little meandering canyon road sporting very few places to fall to one's death. It goes a little slow because the single lane road is narrow, homes are built close to the edge, and the visibility isn't grand and you get stuck behind poky people in your one little lane. But if you know this stuff going in and think about how superior it is to be going poky there with a view (of homes, mostly) rather than being in stop and go traffic on the freeway, it's quite enjoyable. I'll have to remember it. And I need to remember to take my Mullholland Drive tour sometime. I hear it's a fun road too.
Thursday, July 3, 2008
Insides Outside
When I get an idea for a blog post, I tend to put it in the critical blogging path, meaning I put off blogging until I get the big idea out. Sometimes this is good, sometimes I just feel guilty for not updating more often. I know that I like the blogs I read to get updated as often as possible. This week was one where I put all the mental and prep work toward one post. This one.
So you can see my guts.
I had a few reasons for wanting to share my CT scans (that's CAT scans for you old school folk):
Thanks to being maid of honor in a radiologist's wedding, I got a great second opinion on my condition. It made me more confident in the initial report and my pulmonologist said, "well you've certainly made my job easy." This is why they sent me for a lung scan after not finding kidney stones in the ab scan. The grey blob to the left of the arrow is a sequestration of some lung material which is not properly connected to the rest of my lungs. The circle with the orange * is my descending aorta. The bit coming off of it pointed out by the red arrow shouldn't be there.
You can see it better here. It's the bright little barrel in the lower left lung near the spine. The aorta is the tube in front of the spine. This one is brighter from the contrast die. The sequestered bit is fed by the aortic branch instead of the pulmonary artery and does not discharge lung mucous properly. Whenever I think of lung fluid, I think of my internship at Owens Corning Fiberglas (yes, 1 s). They had barrels of "simulated lung fluid" to check to see if their products dissolved in it because if the glass dissolved, it wouldn't cause cancer. Unlike asbestos. My problem, it is not cancer. It's really not even a problem.
It's only a problem if it gets infected. So far so good. Probably a good idea if I don't start smoking. Then I mentioned that I don't get restful sleep (without proper acupuncture) and the pulmonologist said, "Tell me about that! That's much more interesting!" I have a new sleep study coming up in a week or so. Whee. In the meantime, here are some more pictures.
This one inspired me to start taking screen shots.
Because I think it looks like The Scream.
Except for the giant heart that looks like a bag. So in this one, the heart looks a lot more like a heart. And there's something I circled in orange that looks like a basement cat, which is to say 2 glowing eyes. The liver is the other big grey blob on the left, I'm pretty sure. I also like the rib slices.
Here's another vertical slice from the abdominal scan. It's interesting because it's the slice that shows a lot of identifiable parts. Liver, small intestine. Ok, so 2 big organs that are really identifiable. And some bones and leg muscles.
For the curious, Here's the horizontal slice showing the location of the vertical slice. And you can see my boobs.
Here's a very similar shot with the contrast dye which shows the blood vessels branching into the lungs. And more body fat. Yeesh.
And one more vertical slice showing cool organs. I can ID the liver (it's ubiquitous!), the kidneys (which look like embryos in this slice), the lumbar vertebrae of the spine (bright!), ribs, large intestine, blood vessels. Props to anyone who can identify the mystery blob on the right. It's under the left lung, opposite the liver. Is it, by chance, my spleen?
Cool, eh?
So you can see my guts.
I had a few reasons for wanting to share my CT scans (that's CAT scans for you old school folk):
- When do I not share?
- Update on the pulmonology visit
- Thanks for the second opinion
- Cool pictures
Thanks to being maid of honor in a radiologist's wedding, I got a great second opinion on my condition. It made me more confident in the initial report and my pulmonologist said, "well you've certainly made my job easy." This is why they sent me for a lung scan after not finding kidney stones in the ab scan. The grey blob to the left of the arrow is a sequestration of some lung material which is not properly connected to the rest of my lungs. The circle with the orange * is my descending aorta. The bit coming off of it pointed out by the red arrow shouldn't be there.
You can see it better here. It's the bright little barrel in the lower left lung near the spine. The aorta is the tube in front of the spine. This one is brighter from the contrast die. The sequestered bit is fed by the aortic branch instead of the pulmonary artery and does not discharge lung mucous properly. Whenever I think of lung fluid, I think of my internship at Owens Corning Fiberglas (yes, 1 s). They had barrels of "simulated lung fluid" to check to see if their products dissolved in it because if the glass dissolved, it wouldn't cause cancer. Unlike asbestos. My problem, it is not cancer. It's really not even a problem.
It's only a problem if it gets infected. So far so good. Probably a good idea if I don't start smoking. Then I mentioned that I don't get restful sleep (without proper acupuncture) and the pulmonologist said, "Tell me about that! That's much more interesting!" I have a new sleep study coming up in a week or so. Whee. In the meantime, here are some more pictures.
This one inspired me to start taking screen shots.
Because I think it looks like The Scream.
Except for the giant heart that looks like a bag. So in this one, the heart looks a lot more like a heart. And there's something I circled in orange that looks like a basement cat, which is to say 2 glowing eyes. The liver is the other big grey blob on the left, I'm pretty sure. I also like the rib slices.
Here's another vertical slice from the abdominal scan. It's interesting because it's the slice that shows a lot of identifiable parts. Liver, small intestine. Ok, so 2 big organs that are really identifiable. And some bones and leg muscles.
For the curious, Here's the horizontal slice showing the location of the vertical slice. And you can see my boobs.
Here's a very similar shot with the contrast dye which shows the blood vessels branching into the lungs. And more body fat. Yeesh.
And one more vertical slice showing cool organs. I can ID the liver (it's ubiquitous!), the kidneys (which look like embryos in this slice), the lumbar vertebrae of the spine (bright!), ribs, large intestine, blood vessels. Props to anyone who can identify the mystery blob on the right. It's under the left lung, opposite the liver. Is it, by chance, my spleen?
Cool, eh?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
